connectivity problem

good morning!
All was fine until a few hours ago. the sequel was set to windows
authentication only. then i realized i needed a sequel user account which i
then created. then i tried to switch back to mixed mode to make the account
work. things hung for a while and when restarted the sequel no longer accepts
either windows accounts or the new sequel account. so i have basically locked
myself out. do i need to reinstall? is there an easy way to reset the
authentication mode without being able to get into the engine itself? thanks.
-BahmanYou should be able to switch between the authentication modes. Did you get
any error message when tryin to log in?
Linchi
"Bahman" wrote:
> good morning!
> All was fine until a few hours ago. the sequel was set to windows
> authentication only. then i realized i needed a sequel user account which i
> then created. then i tried to switch back to mixed mode to make the account
> work. things hung for a while and when restarted the sequel no longer accepts
> either windows accounts or the new sequel account. so i have basically locked
> myself out. do i need to reinstall? is there an easy way to reset the
> authentication mode without being able to get into the engine itself? thanks.
> -Bahman
>|||yes i did.
it said that it could not connect to sequel. it said one reason could be
that by default sequel 2005 does not allow remote connections.
so i went into surface area and added that functionlity. but surface area
does not allow me to check on authentication mode and switch it. the only
place i could do that was on the engine itself, which i cannot get to at the
moment.
the other issue is that the agent does not start at all. if i try to start
the service is says the service did not start and did not return an error
code. so, i don't know what it is i need to fix.
-Bahman
"Linchi Shea" wrote:
> You should be able to switch between the authentication modes. Did you get
> any error message when tryin to log in?
> Linchi
> "Bahman" wrote:
> > good morning!
> >
> > All was fine until a few hours ago. the sequel was set to windows
> > authentication only. then i realized i needed a sequel user account which i
> > then created. then i tried to switch back to mixed mode to make the account
> > work. things hung for a while and when restarted the sequel no longer accepts
> > either windows accounts or the new sequel account. so i have basically locked
> > myself out. do i need to reinstall? is there an easy way to reset the
> > authentication mode without being able to get into the engine itself? thanks.
> >
> > -Bahman
> >
> >|||Bahman,
Are the buttons greyed out for switching modes. I need to switch from
windows to mixed in 2005 but both buttons are greyed out. Any ideas on how I
can switch to mixed?
Thanks
John
"Bahman" wrote:
> yes i did.
> it said that it could not connect to sequel. it said one reason could be
> that by default sequel 2005 does not allow remote connections.
> so i went into surface area and added that functionlity. but surface area
> does not allow me to check on authentication mode and switch it. the only
> place i could do that was on the engine itself, which i cannot get to at the
> moment.
> the other issue is that the agent does not start at all. if i try to start
> the service is says the service did not start and did not return an error
> code. so, i don't know what it is i need to fix.
> -Bahman
> "Linchi Shea" wrote:
> > You should be able to switch between the authentication modes. Did you get
> > any error message when tryin to log in?
> >
> > Linchi
> >
> > "Bahman" wrote:
> >
> > > good morning!
> > >
> > > All was fine until a few hours ago. the sequel was set to windows
> > > authentication only. then i realized i needed a sequel user account which i
> > > then created. then i tried to switch back to mixed mode to make the account
> > > work. things hung for a while and when restarted the sequel no longer accepts
> > > either windows accounts or the new sequel account. so i have basically locked
> > > myself out. do i need to reinstall? is there an easy way to reset the
> > > authentication mode without being able to get into the engine itself? thanks.
> > >
> > > -Bahman
> > >
> > >|||John,
sorry for delay.
I rebuilt the system. It was gone too far away.
-Bahman
"John B." wrote:
> Bahman,
> Are the buttons greyed out for switching modes. I need to switch from
> windows to mixed in 2005 but both buttons are greyed out. Any ideas on how I
> can switch to mixed?
> Thanks
> John
> "Bahman" wrote:
> > yes i did.
> >
> > it said that it could not connect to sequel. it said one reason could be
> > that by default sequel 2005 does not allow remote connections.
> >
> > so i went into surface area and added that functionlity. but surface area
> > does not allow me to check on authentication mode and switch it. the only
> > place i could do that was on the engine itself, which i cannot get to at the
> > moment.
> >
> > the other issue is that the agent does not start at all. if i try to start
> > the service is says the service did not start and did not return an error
> > code. so, i don't know what it is i need to fix.
> >
> > -Bahman
> >
> > "Linchi Shea" wrote:
> >
> > > You should be able to switch between the authentication modes. Did you get
> > > any error message when tryin to log in?
> > >
> > > Linchi
> > >
> > > "Bahman" wrote:
> > >
> > > > good morning!
> > > >
> > > > All was fine until a few hours ago. the sequel was set to windows
> > > > authentication only. then i realized i needed a sequel user account which i
> > > > then created. then i tried to switch back to mixed mode to make the account
> > > > work. things hung for a while and when restarted the sequel no longer accepts
> > > > either windows accounts or the new sequel account. so i have basically locked
> > > > myself out. do i need to reinstall? is there an easy way to reset the
> > > > authentication mode without being able to get into the engine itself? thanks.
> > > >
> > > > -Bahman
> > > >
> > > >

Connection Timeout

I’ve 2 database servers. These servers communicate with the other’s databases
via TCP/IP with SQL authentication using VB, COM+ & ASP applications. Both
servers are running W2k & SQL2k, each with the latest SPs & hot fixes.
Neither server is a domain server. Server A also supports a VB application
the users access through Terminal Services sessions.
Recently we began experiencing a problem on server A. When logged on to the
server with an administrator account the user can connect to the other
server’s database through the VB applications & through SQL Query Analyzer.
However, when logged on as a user that isn’t an administrator, they cannot
connect to the other server; they get a Timeout Expired error message. This
occurs every time.
From server A when logged on as a standard user we can telnet to server B on
port 1433. We cannot odbcping nor use SQL Query Analyzer to connect to server
B. The IP address & the SQL user /password is included in all connections.
I ran Netmon on server B to see what was coming from server A. I only saw
ack messages. I’m not a Netmon expert, so interpreting these messages is a
little beyond me.
I also suspect the problem is on server A. Why else would one user be able
to connect & another not. Beyond that I’m lost.
The only error I see in any of the Event logs from server A is an error
described by KB 326912.
Thanks in advance for any ideas.
You need to make the connections from the client side and review them. See
if the tcp 3 way handshake is completing.
Q169292 The Basics of Reading TCP/IP Traces
Thanks,
Kevin McDonnell
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
|||I'm able to see a 3 Way Hand Shake & Graceful Close. There is also some Push
activity in the trace.
Examining this activity is iffy at best, because these are production
servers. My problem only occurs when the user on Server A is not an
administrator. Some of the activity in the capture could be the result of
other user activity. I think the trace I captured was during an isolated
period, but I cannot be assured of this. The Hand Shake & Grageful Close were
the 1st & last events in the capture.
"Kevin McDonnell [MSFT]" wrote:

> You need to make the connections from the client side and review them. See
> if the tcp 3 way handshake is completing.
> Q169292 The Basics of Reading TCP/IP Traces
> Thanks,
> Kevin McDonnell
> Microsoft Corporation
> This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
>
|||Is there a policy defined on the system that might explain why there is a
permission problem?
gpresult.exe will show you if any policies are in place.
Are there any security templates in use?
Thanks,
Kevin McDonnell
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
|||I'm not aware of a policy that is set to do that.
I ran gpresult without learning much, which didn't surprise me since this is
a stand-alone server.
There are Local Policies, most are default values. I did read through all of
these & nothing stuck out as a possible culprit. Do you have any policies in
mind that may need further scrutiny?
Sam
"Kevin McDonnell [MSFT]" wrote:

> Is there a policy defined on the system that might explain why there is a
> permission problem?
> gpresult.exe will show you if any policies are in place.
> Are there any security templates in use?
> Thanks,
> Kevin McDonnell
> Microsoft Corporation
> This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
>
|||Clients need "access this computer from the network" permission in order to
establish a connection.
Can the same client map a drive to the server?
Does the problem happen with Named Pipes as well as TCP/IP?
Thanks,
Kevin McDonnell
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
|||I checked the 'Access this computer from the Network' local policy. It
includes Users.
The user connects to Server A through a Terminal Services Connection.
Mapping a drive isn't an option I've pursued.
Since these are standalone servers I don't know how to connect from one to
the other using named pipes. (One is in Atlanta & the other in Washington DC.
They communicate via Internet. Force Encryption is on.) If I enter the
www.servername.com of Server B, I think that uses TCP/IP. I tried it in Query
Analyzer & got the Timeout message.
I installed FileMon from www.SysInternal.com on Server A. I saw some files
that were not found, but the system reverted to Winnt\system32 for the same
files & was succesful. I didn't see any unsuccessful attempts logged for the
User. This leads me to suppose it isn't a file permission problem.
I restarted Server A last night, but this didn't accompolish anything either.
Sam
"Kevin McDonnell [MSFT]" wrote:

> Clients need "access this computer from the network" permission in order to
> establish a connection.
> Can the same client map a drive to the server?
> Does the problem happen with Named Pipes as well as TCP/IP?
> Thanks,
> Kevin McDonnell
> Microsoft Corporation
> This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
>
|||I would run Microsoft Network Monitor from the Terminal Server machine to
trace the traffic to SQL.
Compare the admin trace to the user trace.
Thanks,
Kevin McDonnell
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
|||I have the traces. I was able to run them when there wasn't any other
activity between the systems.
Both traces are escentially the the same except in the admin trace I see
more TDS protocol packets. Both start with the 3 Way Hand Shake & end with
the Graceful Close. The 1st 12 packets of each trace are the same. Then the
admin trace has 12 TDS protocol packets with a description beginning with
'UNKNOWN EPM ACK Len ='. The trace that fails does not have any of these
packets.
The user trace does have some TDS protocol packets, but for some reason that
the trace doesn't show, it doesn't continue with the TDS packets the admin
trace has.
Sam
"Kevin McDonnell [MSFT]" wrote:

> I would run Microsoft Network Monitor from the Terminal Server machine to
> trace the traffic to SQL.
> Compare the admin trace to the user trace.
> Thanks,
> Kevin McDonnell
> Microsoft Corporation
> This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
>
|||Hi Sam,
Sounds like you made a good capture. Unfortunately, the best way to
resolve this would be to open a case and have a SQL Engineer review the
traces. It would be too difficult to diagnose the traces in this forum.
Thanks,
Kevin McDonnell
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.

Connection Timeout

I’ve 2 database servers. These servers communicate with the other’s data
bases
via TCP/IP with SQL authentication using VB, COM+ & ASP applications. Both
servers are running W2k & SQL2k, each with the latest SPs & hot fixes.
Neither server is a domain server. Server A also supports a VB application
the users access through Terminal Services sessions.
Recently we began experiencing a problem on server A. When logged on to the
server with an administrator account the user can connect to the other
server’s database through the VB applications & through SQL Query Analyzer
.
However, when logged on as a user that isn’t an administrator, they cannot
connect to the other server; they get a Timeout Expired error message. This
occurs every time.
From server A when logged on as a standard user we can telnet to server B on
port 1433. We cannot odbcping nor use SQL Query Analyzer to connect to serve
r
B. The IP address & the SQL user /password is included in all connections.
I ran Netmon on server B to see what was coming from server A. I only saw
ack messages. I’m not a Netmon expert, so interpreting these messages is a
little beyond me.
I also suspect the problem is on server A. Why else would one user be able
to connect & another not. Beyond that I’m lost.
The only error I see in any of the Event logs from server A is an error
described by KB 326912.
Thanks in advance for any ideas.You need to make the connections from the client side and review them. See
if the tcp 3 way handshake is completing.
Q169292 The Basics of Reading TCP/IP Traces
Thanks,
Kevin McDonnell
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.|||I'm able to see a 3 Way Hand Shake & Graceful Close. There is also some Push
activity in the trace.
Examining this activity is iffy at best, because these are production
servers. My problem only occurs when the user on Server A is not an
administrator. Some of the activity in the capture could be the result of
other user activity. I think the trace I captured was during an isolated
period, but I cannot be assured of this. The Hand Shake & Grageful Close wer
e
the 1st & last events in the capture.
"Kevin McDonnell [MSFT]" wrote:

> You need to make the connections from the client side and review them. Se
e
> if the tcp 3 way handshake is completing.
> Q169292 The Basics of Reading TCP/IP Traces
> Thanks,
> Kevin McDonnell
> Microsoft Corporation
> This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
>|||Is there a policy defined on the system that might explain why there is a
permission problem?
gpresult.exe will show you if any policies are in place.
Are there any security templates in use?
Thanks,
Kevin McDonnell
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.|||I'm not aware of a policy that is set to do that.
I ran gpresult without learning much, which didn't surprise me since this is
a stand-alone server.
There are Local Policies, most are default values. I did read through all of
these & nothing stuck out as a possible culprit. Do you have any policies in
mind that may need further scrutiny?
Sam
"Kevin McDonnell [MSFT]" wrote:

> Is there a policy defined on the system that might explain why there is a
> permission problem?
> gpresult.exe will show you if any policies are in place.
> Are there any security templates in use?
> Thanks,
> Kevin McDonnell
> Microsoft Corporation
> This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
>|||Clients need "access this computer from the network" permission in order to
establish a connection.
Can the same client map a drive to the server?
Does the problem happen with Named Pipes as well as TCP/IP?
Thanks,
Kevin McDonnell
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.|||I checked the 'Access this computer from the Network' local policy. It
includes Users.
The user connects to Server A through a Terminal Services Connection.
Mapping a drive isn't an option I've pursued.
Since these are standalone servers I don't know how to connect from one to
the other using named pipes. (One is in Atlanta & the other in Washington DC
.
They communicate via Internet. Force Encryption is on.) If I enter the
www.servername.com of Server B, I think that uses TCP/IP. I tried it in Quer
y
Analyzer & got the Timeout message.
I installed FileMon from www.SysInternal.com on Server A. I saw some files
that were not found, but the system reverted to Winnt\system32 for the same
files & was succesful. I didn't see any unsuccessful attempts logged for the
User. This leads me to suppose it isn't a file permission problem.
I restarted Server A last night, but this didn't accompolish anything either
.
Sam
"Kevin McDonnell [MSFT]" wrote:

> Clients need "access this computer from the network" permission in order t
o
> establish a connection.
> Can the same client map a drive to the server?
> Does the problem happen with Named Pipes as well as TCP/IP?
> Thanks,
> Kevin McDonnell
> Microsoft Corporation
> This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
>|||I would run Microsoft Network Monitor from the Terminal Server machine to
trace the traffic to SQL.
Compare the admin trace to the user trace.
Thanks,
Kevin McDonnell
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.|||I have the traces. I was able to run them when there wasn't any other
activity between the systems.
Both traces are escentially the the same except in the admin trace I see
more TDS protocol packets. Both start with the 3 Way Hand Shake & end with
the Graceful Close. The 1st 12 packets of each trace are the same. Then the
admin trace has 12 TDS protocol packets with a description beginning with
'UNKNOWN EPM ACK Len ='. The trace that fails does not have any of these
packets.
The user trace does have some TDS protocol packets, but for some reason that
the trace doesn't show, it doesn't continue with the TDS packets the admin
trace has.
Sam
"Kevin McDonnell [MSFT]" wrote:

> I would run Microsoft Network Monitor from the Terminal Server machine to
> trace the traffic to SQL.
> Compare the admin trace to the user trace.
> Thanks,
> Kevin McDonnell
> Microsoft Corporation
> This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
>|||Hi Sam,
Sounds like you made a good capture. Unfortunately, the best way to
resolve this would be to open a case and have a SQL Engineer review the
traces. It would be too difficult to diagnose the traces in this forum.
Thanks,
Kevin McDonnell
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.

connection string with authenticated user info

Hi. New to ASP.NET and first time posting.

My web app connects to a SQL database - SQL authentication.

Users login to the web app through the login server control. Once authenticated, it is my understanding that the user name and password are stored on the client as a cookie.

How do you programmatically get this user info and use it for the userid and password parameters of the connection string?

Is there a better way to use the authenticated user info to access a SQL database?

Thanks

Once authenticated (using asp.net login control), you can get the user info programmatically using:

Page

.User.Identity ( for example,Page.User.Identity.Name returns the username )|||

Thanks for the info.

I did some reading on Page.User.Identity, but don't understand how to get the password used for login. I need both the username and password to authenticate in SQL server.

connection string using sql authentication

i'm having trouble getting my project to work on other machines using windows authentication, so as this is urgent I want to change it to sql authentication. I've enabled sql authentication and enabled the sa login, could someone please tell me how to connect to my db

my connection string is currently as follows using windows authentication:

<

connectionStrings>

<

addname="GuitarShackConnection"connectionString="Server=(local)\SqlExpress;Integrated Security=True;Database=GuitarShack;"providerName="System.Data.SqlClient"/>

<

addname="GuitarShackConnectionString"connectionString="Data Source=(local)\SQLEXPRESS;Initial Catalog=GuitarShack;Integrated Security=True"providerName="System.Data.SqlClient"/>

<

addname="CustomerNameDS"connectionString="Data Source=.\SQLEXPRESS;AttachDbFilename=|DataDirectory|\ASPNETDB.MDF;Integrated Security=True;User Instance=True"providerName="System.Data.SqlClient"/>

</

connectionStrings><add name="ConnectionString" connectionString="Server=.\SQLEXPRESS;Database=xxxxxxxxxx;User ID=xxxxxxx;Password=xxxxxxx;Trusted_Connection=False"
providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />|||

i've enabled sa and restarted the sql service but when i go to modify the connection in the database explorer and enter the credentials it returns an error when i test the connection:

the user sa is not associated with a trusted sql connection

any ideas what would cause this?

|||The full ins and outs of Sql Server permissions are beyond me, because I find it difficult to remember what user can do what. So I administer my servers using Windows Authentication on the local machine, set the Server up to operate in Mixed Mode, then create application users. I give these users the absolute minimum permissions possible, which is only actuallyExecute on the stored procedures I create for the app. They have no SELECT, DELETE, UPDATE or INSERT permissions. I know that you must NEVER use the sa account to connect to SQL Server from your ASP.NET app. That user has every privilege going.|||

Hi, the follow steps may be helpful to you.

To change security authentication mode
1. In SQL Server Management Studio Object Explorer, right-click your server, and then click Properties.
2. On the Security page, under Server authentication, select the new server authentication mode, and then click OK.
3. In the SQL Server Management Studio dialog box, click OK, to acknowledge the need to restart SQL Server.

To restart SQL Server from SQL Server Management Studio
1. In Object Explorer, right-click your server, and then click Restart. If running, SQL Server Agent must also be restarted.

To enable the sa login
1. Execute the following statements to enable the sa password and assign a password.
ALTER LOGIN sa ENABLE ;
GO
ALTER LOGIN sa WITH PASSWORD = '<password>' ;
GO

Thanks.

connection string

I use sa account to establish connection from .NET web application with SQL
database.
Now I have to use windows authentication and any combination of windows
accounts with different rights have been failed. I'm always getting the same
error:
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Login failed for user 'username'.
any ideas will be appreciated.
Thanks,Hi,
You want to use Integrated Security, right?
cnn.ConnectionString = "integrated security=SSPI;data source=" & dbServer &
";" & _
"persist security info=False;initial catalog=VPOInventory"
HTH
--
Dan Artuso, MVP
"Alan" <Alan@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:76566908-5D49-4A5E-8F0C-343B9
1CD0FE2@.microsoft.com...
> I use sa account to establish connection from .NET web application with SQ
L
> database.
> Now I have to use windows authentication and any combination of windows
> accounts with different rights have been failed. I'm always getting the sa
me
> error:
> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Login failed for user 'username'.
> any ideas will be appreciated.
> Thanks,
>|||Check to see if you are using mixed mode for sql server
authentication(windows/sa).That might be your problem.you might have used 's
a
authentication only'
"Alan" wrote:

> I use sa account to establish connection from .NET web application with SQ
L
> database.
> Now I have to use windows authentication and any combination of windows
> accounts with different rights have been failed. I'm always getting the sa
me
> error:
> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Login failed for user 'username'.
> any ideas will be appreciated.
> Thanks,
>|||check to see if you are using mixed mode sql server authentication.that migh
t
be your problem.you might be using 'sa only' authentication.
"Alan" wrote:

> I use sa account to establish connection from .NET web application with SQ
L
> database.
> Now I have to use windows authentication and any combination of windows
> accounts with different rights have been failed. I'm always getting the sa
me
> error:
> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Login failed for user 'username'.
> any ideas will be appreciated.
> Thanks,
>|||did it help?
"Alan" wrote:

> I use sa account to establish connection from .NET web application with SQ
L
> database.
> Now I have to use windows authentication and any combination of windows
> accounts with different rights have been failed. I'm always getting the sa
me
> error:
> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Login failed for user 'username'.
> any ideas will be appreciated.
> Thanks,
>|||Hello Alan,
Also, please never use SA in your application. You should create an account
for your application to run as and only grant the necessary permissions to
that user. The same goes for Windows Authentication. Don't grant the user
you use for running your application membership into the system administrato
rs
role.
Aaron Weiker
http://aaronweiker.com/
http://sqlprogrammer.org/

> I use sa account to establish connection from .NET web application
> with SQL
> database.
> Now I have to use windows authentication and any combination of
> windows
> accounts with different rights have been failed. I'm always getting
> the same
> error:
> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Login failed for user 'username'.
> any ideas will be appreciated.
> Thanks,
>|||Thank you,
your advise was very helpful.
"Dan Artuso" wrote:

> Hi,
> You want to use Integrated Security, right?
> cnn.ConnectionString = "integrated security=SSPI;data source=" & dbServer
& ";" & _
> "persist security info=False;initial catalog=VPOInventory"
>
> --
> HTH
> --
> Dan Artuso, MVP
>
> "Alan" <Alan@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:76566908-5D4
9-4A5E-8F0C-343B91CD0FE2@.microsoft.com...
>
>|||Our SQL server is running in mixed mode and I want to move it to Windows onl
y
mode.
Thank you.
"Preeta" wrote:
> did it help?
> "Alan" wrote:
>|||Thank you - I'm trying to get rid of this account.
First I want to move all our SQL servers to Windows only mode.
Thank you.
"Aaron Weiker" wrote:

> Hello Alan,
> Also, please never use SA in your application. You should create an accoun
t
> for your application to run as and only grant the necessary permissions to
> that user. The same goes for Windows Authentication. Don't grant the user
> you use for running your application membership into the system administra
tors
> role.
> --
> Aaron Weiker
> http://aaronweiker.com/
> http://sqlprogrammer.org/
>
>
>

Connection remotely gives error.

Hi
When I sign on to my SQL server locally using windows authentication all is
ok.
When I sign on at a client PC I get "Logon failed for user xxx/guest"
Using SQL Authority works ok.
Any suggestions?
TimWhen you connect remotely are you logged into the domain?
Can you map a drive to the SQL Server machine?
Thanks,
Kevin McDonnell
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.|||Kevin,
Thanks for the reply.
I have solved the problem now, it was down to permissions.
Tim
"Kevin McDonnell [MSFT]" <kevmc@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:bPJp2bFkEHA.2632@.cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl...
> When you connect remotely are you logged into the domain?
> Can you map a drive to the SQL Server machine?
> Thanks,
> Kevin McDonnell
> Microsoft Corporation
> This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
>